Thursday, May 31, 2012

Friendly Accounting at Facebook



This post is courtesy of the Accounting Onion


U. S. Senator Carl Levin recently spoke on the Senate floor, referencing the discrepancy between tax and accounting treatment of stock options in the (then upcoming) Facebook IPO:


"According to its filings, when Facebook goes public, Mr. [Mark] Zuckerberg plans to exercise options to purchase 120 million shares of stock for 6 cents a share. Mr. Zuckerberg's shares, obviously, are going to be worth a great deal more than 6 cents, a total of about $7 million; they will apparently be worth more than 600 times as much, something in the neighborhood of $5 billion.


Here's where the tax loophole comes in. Under current law, Facebook can – perfectly legally – tell investors, the public, and regulators that the stock options he received cost the company a mere 6 cents a share – that's the expense shown on the company's books. [This is wrong – see later.] But the company can also – perfectly legally – later file a tax return claiming that those same options cost the company something close to what the shares actually sell for later on – perhaps $40 a share. And the company can take a tax deduction for that far large [sic] amount. So the books show a highly profitable company – profitable, in part, because of the relatively small expense the company shows on its books for the stock options it grants to its employees. But when it comes time to pay taxes, to pay Uncle Sam, the loophole in the tax code allows the company to take a tax deduction for a far larger expense than they show on their books. …


Now, the end result is that a profitable U.S. corporation – a success story – could end up paying no taxes at all for years, even decades."
To Levin, the Facebook IPO is a dramatic illustration of an inequitable "loophole" in the tax law. As Levin and Sherrod would have it, Facebook's tax deduction for using stock options to compensate executives – as opposed to any other form of compensation – would be essentially zero (that's probably a little dramatic on my part, but the point is the same); yet, Zuckerberg's tax liability when he exercises the options could be somewhere in the area of $3 billion.


The strong implication of Levin's narrative is that the extra amount of expenses would have wiped out every dollar of Facebook's reported net income that it had ever 'earned.' On top of that, there could be other outstanding options held by Zuckerberg and other employees extending way down the organization, which are going to have the same effect on future reported net income.


Which brings me to my second question: For all practical purposes, could Zuckerberg be taking Facebook public at this point in time with no history of profitability, perhaps negative shareholders' equity, and perhaps no hopes for earnings for some for years to come?


My inclination is to say "no," but I can only speculate. So, I will answer that question with another question: Since the FASB's rules understate the economic cost of options granted to employees, did the FASB provide a perverse incentive to Facebook to grant more options (or at terms overly favorable) to employees than it should have?


If one accepts the maxim that "what gets mismeasured gets mismanaged," then the answer to that question should be "YES." The stock option problem lies not with the tax rules that eventually recognize the full cost of the options to shareholders, but with the financial reporting rules that allowed Facebook to grant options without recording their full cost.


Surely, the senators can see that different accounting rules would have wrought different compensation policies from Facebook. Senator Levin would not have had a story to tell and Mark Zuckerberg would be a few billion dollars poorer.


Footnote: It is my distinct pleasure to provide Senator Levin (and his staff) with yet another accounting lesson. The amount of expense to be reported by Facebook is not, as the senator claims, the exercise price of the options (i.e., 6 cents per share). Assuming that the options were issued without any intrinsic value, then their "grant-date present value" (i.e., the amount upon which periodic option expense is measured) could end up being more or less than 6 cents per share. Although this technical correction to Senator Levin's story it doesn't fundamentally change the message, it once again reveals a lack of understanding that makes one question if Senator Levin has an adequate grasp on the issues.





13 comments:

Kuldeep Singh said...

ISO 9001:2008 Certification provided Better and easy marketability. ISO 9001:2008 Standard is a globally recognized Quality Management System. ISO 9001:2008 Certification acts as a prominent quality standard in the present competitive industry. ISO 9001:2008 standard carefully inspects the organization, where the company needs to demonstrate its ability to constantly supply with products that leads to customer satisfaction.

Joe M. said...

Umm you appear to have just repeated yourself Kuldeep.

fixerrep said...

Very pleased to find this site. I want to thank you for this great read.
Online Financial Software

Jerry M said...

Boy am I glad I found this today. Thank you for posting this!

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Jamie Shellman said...

Since the Internet is a startup industry, the standard rules and policies as to how to get full hold of it is yet to be done. Right and just taxation is one of them. There are so many ways Facebook is making money with this top social networking site, but the government has to keep track of them yet so they can find a way to make profits on the billion-dollar worth company of Mr. Zuckerberg.

Jamie Shellman

Unknown said...

Online emr
Thanks for sharing fabulous information. It's my pleasure to read it. I have also bookmarked you for checking out new posts.

Blade Helicopters said...

Great ! article posting so i read carefully and get more new ideas.its very useful for me.
Hobby Shop Preston

Simmyjessure said...

HI, So Nice post which give informatics content for Reader ,excellent written content by Author which i want to read again and again Thanks For Sharing Such as Blog.

Arabic TV Channels

Simmyjessure said...

Awesome Artical Really i looking this type of valuable information since many days i found satisfaction when Read your blog Thanks for giving this type blog

Free Arabic Channels

Simmyjessure said...

Really so Interesting Artical Which is give more entertainment After Reading Your Artical and give amazing feeling you also get entertainment from our website which provide many type of Arabic channels

Free Arabic Channels

Unknown said...

How Teaching English

I’ve been browsing online from more time, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It is pretty worth enough for me. In my view, if all webmasters and bloggers made good content blog and article as you did, the internet will be much more useful than ever before.

Teaching Nomad is your connection to Teaching in China for teaching international schools. We have international school employment and teaching ESL students opportunities. Contact us today!

Unknown said...

Wholesale Mobile Phone Case

Very good write-up.I definitely appreciate this site.In my view, if all webmasters and bloggers made good content blog and article as you did . Thanks for posting such a informative information.

Dealspeeds provides Online Cheap Mobile Phone Gadgets, Wholesale Cell Phone Accessories, Mobile cell phone accessories, Mobile Phone Gadgets, cheap Phone Gadgets at affordable price.